Mormon Dope

I noticed that in Vice's documentary on Mitt Romney's polygamist relatives in Mexico that those relatives openly consumed alcohol at bars, in that very documentary. In the Book of Mormon there is a story about how a spiritual leader becomes corrupt, replacing his priests with wicked men who would support his wicked polygamy and alcohol consumption. This brought the curse of alcohol onto his people as they struggled to cope with the adverse social consequences of their leader's abuse of women, as seen in Mosiah Chapter 11:

"14 And it came to pass that he placed his heart upon his riches, and he spent his time in riotous living with his wives and his concubines; and so did also his priests spend their time with harlots. 

15 And it came to pass that he planted vineyards round about in the land; and he built wine-presses, and made wine in abundance; and therefore he became a wine-bibber, and also his people.”

Distilled spirits, particularly whiskey, was the hardest drug of the old west. Keep in mind the other candidates for hardest drug would be tobacco, coffee, cannabis, smoking opium, and Laudanum (opium tincture.) We need to consider what makes a drug "hard":

1. Level of intoxication from the substance, how much judgement is impaired by using it.
2. How serious the withdrawals are from the substance.
3. How addictive the substance is.
4. Long term health consequences.

Contrary to popular belief, even today alcohol is the worst drug you can use. I am not saying to avoid using vanilla in cooking or a sip of wine in a religious communion ceremony, but in any mount strong enough to give you any kind of buzz, alcohol damages all of the soft tissues of your body, reducing your brain volume, damaging your heart (never helping it,) and liver, and shooting your cancer risk up as much as tobacco or asbestos. Alcohol more so than other drugs leads to bad life choices and dangerous accidents while under it's influence. And on top of all that, alcohol has the most deadly withdrawals of any drug:

Alcohol is clearly than far more dangerous than cannabis, tobacco and coffee, since withdrawals from those drugs amount to irritability that lasts for several days, the health consequences are far less severe, and the behavioral problems caused by the drugs are not nearly as extreme as alcohol. But what about the opiates, opium and laudanum, are they not more addictive, are the withdrawals not as serious? Well as per the video above, no, opiate withdrawals are NOT as bad as alcohol withdrawal, alcohol withdrawal is far more dangerous.

While it's true that opiates may be more addictive than alcohol to some people, this is also true of tobacco for all people, and not the only consideration in how "hard" a drug is. What gives opiates a bad name in today's world is we are dealing with highly concentrated forms such as heroin and fentanyl that are very easy to accidentally fatally overdose on. Smoking opium or measuring out laudanum one drop at a time is a much less concentrated form of opiate that is a lot harder to overdose on. Other than that, the long term health consequences of opiate use though definitely not good for you, are relatively harmless compared to the universal soft tissue damage that alcohol does to your body.

So that's it, the hardest drug of the Old West was definitely distilled spirits, especially whiskey. As a Latter-Day Saint I have been disappointed a number of times by people living in Utah who have a care-free attitude when it comes to the consumption of alcohol, because it is against our religion. In general I have found them quite ignorant of the harmful effects of alcohol, and just how hard of a drug it was that Brigham Young was peddling in Utah as he owned a Whiskey facility. The Lord said in Doctrine and Covenants chapter 89 verses 3-5:

"...to the ...weakest of all ...who ...can be called saints... thus saith the Lord unto you: In consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days, I have warned you, and forewarn you... That inasmuch as any man drinketh wine or strong drink among you, behold it is not good, neither meet in the sight of your Father..."

Brigham Young owning a Whiskey distillery, according the the Lord, would then qualify Brigham as someone who was less than "the weakest of all who could be called saints," and that Brigham Young was a "conspiring man" who hand "evils and designs existing in his heart." Of course as an active, faithful, mainstream Latter-Day Saint I realize this is not "The Church of the Prophets of Latter Day Saints," and that in the above D&C quote the Lord "forewarned" us about Brigham Young. This is instead "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints," where we all strive to develop our own individual relationship with God rather than on gambling on reliability of Church administrators:

I Told You So

People talk like martial arts has arrived, and that we have good solutions for teaching every day people with an every day lifestyle effective fighting skills that they can reliably use to protect themselves, and that we can do this without injuring them worse than they would be if they were mugged on the street. But we don't, martial arts has a long ways to go before we have any such training developed.

There are 4 Olympic Sports, 2 striking (Taekwondo and Boxing,) 2 grappling (Judo and Wrestling.)  1 striking and 1 grappling have Gi (martial arts uniforms, Tae Kwon Do and Judo) and there is a striking and grappling art that do not have Gi (boxing and wrestling.) Of these 4 arts, Judo (Gi grappling) is the most injurious and Wrestling (no-Gi grappling)  is the least injurious: https://combatsportslaw.com/2020/11/23/study-judo-has-highest-injury-rate-among-olympic-combat-sports/

I have been concerned for a while now that the more over-specialized a martial art gets, the more disconnected it gets from applicable self defense technique, and the more there is a risk of repetitive stress injury. My personal experience is that grappling in a Gi is far more injurious than grappling in regular exercise clothes, and that fits well with the Judo rate of injury vs Wrestling rate of injury listed above. I have been particularly concerned about Brazillian Jiu-Jitsu becoming both more dangerous and less applicable to self defense the more disconnected it gets from MMA.

I told you so in 2023 in regards to my own experiences and observations, in regards to Icy Mike seeing huge mobility problems from long term practice of BJJ, and based on Joe of Fight Bible getting his neck broken in BJJ practice. One study found that 2 out of 3 BJJ practitioners are injured in their first 3 years of training: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8721390/

Now BJJ advocate Rokas has gotten a taste of how much BJJ improves your ability to defend yourself:

Feeling the Spirit

Once critics come to the realization that Joseph Smith (or anyone else in Joesph Smith's time and place) did not write the Book of Mormon, one possible next step for them is to say that the LDS are misled by the devil. Because we "feel the spirit" and trust that the good, peaceful, warm feelings we get (when we are doing our best to do what is right) are from God, supposedly we are vulnerable in this way to being misled by the devil's manipulation of our emotions. The problem here is that if you are NOT "feeling the spirit" as we do, you are not experiencing the spirit Jesus promised his followers.

Jesus said to his followers in John chapter 14 verses 15-17:

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments. 

16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 

17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.

And in verses 26-27 Jesus again emphasizes this is a supernatural experience Christians should expect to have:

26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. 

27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.

Later Paul writes to fellow Christians in Phillipians Chapter 4 versus 6-7 that what the LDS call "feeling the spirit" should be a normal part of your daily prayer:

 6 Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God. 

7 And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.

Those relying primarily on human interpretation of ancient scripture in order to communicate with God would do well to consider that God understands the human mind, and knows that in order to communicate with us effectively, he has to pass knowledge to us in a way that goes beyond words, he also communicates directly to our hearts. This is probably because humans make decisions primarily through their feelings first, and then justify those decisions through logic later:

When Joseph Smith was translating the Book of Mormon as commanded by Jesus Christ, Jesus taught him a basic formula for divination, when Jesus told him in Doctrine & Covenants Chapter 9 versus 7-8 (1829):

7 Behold, you have not understood; you have supposed that I would give it unto you, when you took no thought save it was to ask me.  

 

8 But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right. 

This divination exercise of first studying something out carefully in your mind before asking God about it, and then second praying to ask God about it, then third God will let you know if your are right in your heart, is repeated in the last chapter of the Book of Mormon itself:

3 Behold, I would exhort you that when ye shall read these things, if it be wisdom in God that ye should read them, that ye would remember how merciful the Lord hath been unto the children of men, from the creation of Adam even down until the time that ye shall receive these things, and ponder it in your hearts. 

4 And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost. 

5 And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.

Dialectical Behavioral Therapy is one of the most effective tools counselors have today for treating personality disorders, suicidal ideation and chemical dependency. One of the core concepts is similar to what God was telling Joseph Smith (to get his heart and mind in the same place, if he wanted to know what was right.) In DBT this secular concept, usually pursued without prayer, is called the "Wise Mind" (late 1970's):

LDS religious practice is not the only place I have "felt the spirit," and LDS believe that the Holy Ghost will often communicate to people through their hearts outside of religious observance. While I was a student I was required to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings for certain addictions classes I was taking, and I "felt the spirit" very strongly at one of those. It is very interesting to me that the Serenity Prayer asks God to bring peace and wisdom by reconciling our hearts and minds:

Secular Justification for Faith Selection

Faith is those beliefs you hold so strongly that they impact your decisions. When it comes to free will, what faith you chose is one of the most important factors in determining what decisions you will make. God insists on us having free will, and so he makes us chose our faith. But in so far as God will judge you for any decision you make, God will most certainly judge you for what faith you chose.

God knows you can not with 100% certainty determine if God is really there or not. Therefore God expects you to chose your faith for the best possible reasons, spiritual, historical, personal and secular. The secular and practical reasons for choosing a faith are some of the most important reasons for choosing a faith, because God knows you have 100% certainty about secular and practical reality you experience. God will judge you for your secular reasons to pick a faith.

A religion is an organized faith system and faith community. In order to do something well, we almost always require feedback from others. In order to exercise faith competently, it is clearly best to participate in a religion.

Your choosing a religion is key to God's evaluation of you, and your secular reasons for picking a religion are the most important reasons, because they are the most tangible reasons.

"I am in my religion because my family is in this religion and they are very serious about me staying in the religion" is actually a very good reason to be in a religion. "I picked this religion because I liked how the people acted who were part of this religion" is another good reason to be in a religion. "I picked this religion because their rules made sense to me for having a better life" is a particularly excellent reason to pick a religion, as is "I could see myself raising a happy family in this religion." 

God IS watching your decision and why you are making it. In fact the worst thing you can do is to just avoid choosing a religion, because life goes on without you having the benefit of having effectively pursued faith.

Avoid religions wear shunning is encouraged. In a worst case scenario this would be where family members are not allowed to speak to each other because of their status in a religion. This behavior is not socially sustainable, it is anti-family, it implies unhealthy power dynamics inside of the organization, and it suggests ulterior motives by the leaders of that religious organization. Religious shunning is not good and not of God.

LDS Opinions

 There is a huge diversity of belief when within the mainstream LDS faith, with possible differing opinions on many topics. Here I will explain what my current opinions are on various common LDS disagreements. 

My basic principle behind all these opinions is "quality of evidence over quantity of evidence." In general a witness statement is more accurate: 1) how soon it was after the event happened, and 2) from a first hand witness. When we get into recollections from long after the events happened or start playing the telephone game, evidence deteriorates in quality. This has caused me to be what I call "Vanilla 90's LDS." In the 90's we generally considered embarrassing "facts" about the Church to be attacks by anti-Mormons:

1. I think the Book of Mormon took place in Mesoamerica, at the dates suggested in the book. The quality of evidence for the Mesoamerican hypothesis is superior to alternative theories:

2. I don't think Joseph Smith Jr used a "magic rock" to translate the Book of Mormon, I think he did it with the tools that came with the plates...

3. I seriously doubt Joseph Smith was a polygamist. In a nutshell:

4. I think polygamy has always been a sin, and that when ever it has been practiced, it has been a mistake. I don't think God has ever commanded anyone to do polygamy, I think it's a social contagion that forces of evil use as a weapon of mass destruction against humanity:

5. I don't have a big problem with Brigham Young going off the rails and the LDS Church still being of God. Jesus had Judas, that doesn't mean Jesus wasn't the real deal. Normally when organizations change as much as the LDS Church did between the time of Joseph Smith Jr. and the time of Brigham Young, that organization will continue to go off in that crazy new direction. Instead with the LDS Church we saw big course corrections making it like what Joseph Smith Jr. established in the first place. I take this as evidence that this is not "The Church of the Prophets of Latter-Day Saints," but "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints."

Shadow of Evil

"Ex Nihilo" is the belief that God created the world out of nothing. The "Problem of Evil" is an argument against God existing: it is impossible for a Good Creator of the world to exist because the world has so much evil in it. This Problem of Evil argument depends on God creating the world out of nothing and thus intentionally bringing forth evil.

 But the Problem of Evil's premise of Ex Nihilo is totally and completely wrong:

God created (past tense) the universe out of chaos? Consider all the great religious teachers throughout history, Buddha, Muhammad, Jesus, more recently Martin Luther King Jr., Joseph Smith Jr., Pope Francis, etc. What is the one thing they all ask us to do in the name of God? Be better people than we are NOW. IF God has spoken through ANY of these leaders, God is using this world as a tool to help make us better people. Therefore God is creating (present tense) the universe out of chaos.

As evil (chaos) preceded good (creation,) when one of God's creatures exercises free will to chose evil over good, that's not God's fault. Evil was already there, and bringing forth creatures with free will into the universe IS more opportunity for creatures to choose good and thus become good. Creating creatures with free will is a risk God takes in order to make the universe a better place.

Some have wondered if evil is the shadow or absence of good, or does evil have it's own agenda? I say it is both: the status quo of the Universe and our world is dark and chaotic (as Earnest Becker said "...red in tooth and claw, destroying all she creates...") and that the only significant justice and mercy that comes to the Universe that we know of is established by humanity (literally through humans.) God is literally using his children to make the world a better place. Evil is the default state of the universe, and good is thus the shadow or absence of evil.

But I mean shadow here in a most sinister sense: a predator stalking it's prey. Good consumes evil: bad situations are a creative opportunity to create better situations. Evil can cry and squirm and tell nasty stories about good, and though much evil may eventually escape good's hunt, evil's protest will not keep good from having it's feasts. The universe is a massive lemon grove with no delicious fruit, but God & friends are lemon-aid enthusiasts.

Push Hands

Push Hands refers to a wide range of exercises within the Martial Arts. Most fighting styles that train in push hands do not practice all these types of push hands. Here I will describe the general types of Push Hands:

• Single Hand (sensitivity drills)
• Stationary (balance drills)
• Restricted Step (technical sparring)
• Moving Step (free sparring)
• Beyond Push hands (San Shou and Weapon Sparring)

Single Hand Push Hands (sensitivity drills)

The most common form of push hands is done as an exercise to build the attribute of of feeling what your your opponent is trying to do. The most common of these drills is single-hand push hands in Tai Chi (though there are also other sensitivity drills in Tai Chi that are both one handed and different from this one, and two handed sensitivity drills):

Again push hands is trained in many different fighting styles. Here are push hands sensitivity drills found in Goju Ryu Karate:

Stationary Push Hands (balance drills)

Tai Chi is well known for improving the attribute of balance, aka fall prevention. Part of how this is done is with push hands drills were two resisting partners try to get each other to move one of their feet. There are actual completions in this type of stationary push hands, and most "internal" Chinese fighting styles have practitioners who participate:

Restricted Step Push Hands (technical sparring)

Resticed Step (or "fixed step") Push Hands is a bridge between Stationary Push Hands and free sparring. Because no one wins fights by simply getting someone to move their feet, Fixed Step Push Hands allows for higly limited foot movement in order to create the kind of momentum that can result in putting the opponent on the ground or out of the ring. There are different variations of Fixed Step Push Hands competitions, and each variation is very technical:

Moving Step Push Hands (free sparring)

Moving Step Push Hands is essentially the safest possible form of free sparring. The object is to get the opponent out of the ring or off of their feet; basically Sumo without the head contact. The most injurious techniques such as slamming your body down on your opponent, striking, joint locks, etc are not usually allowed:

There is a lot of variation in Moving Step Push Hands. In some schools or competitions they allow elbow or shoulder strikes to the body, or wrist locks, and various other grappling techniques not usually seen in other Moving Step practices. For example here is a training video from Chen Village which shows an in house Moving Step Push Hands workout allowing quite a bit of head contact:

You know how in boxing it gets boring when the referee has to break up the fighters from the clinch? Moving Step Push Hands is essentially that fighting which should be allowed instead of having referee interference. Moving Step Push Hands is then a base to build on for other types of free sparring, such as fighting on the Lei Tai or sparring with weapons.

Beyond Push Hands (Lei Tai and Weapon Sparring)

In Tai Chi and other marital arts we often see instructors adding more striking techniques from forms to the Moving Step Push Hands for free sparring.  Just for example, here is a casual Tai Chi practitioner in black pants applying his Tai Chi free sparring against a Kickboxer in a Lei Tai fight, and you can clearly see his Push Hands technique:

Another range of combat that can be built on Moving Step Push Hands is weapon free sparring. For example: