Age Appropriate Training

Here's my take on what type of martial arts training is appropriate for people at different ages...

For children, your best bet is some form of grappling, because should they lose their temper, be guilty of bullying, or have to use their skills on another child in self defense, at least they are wrestling around with the other child instead of physically beating the other child. Regardless of what the child goes on to study as they grow older, the grappling of their childhood will always be helpful to them. My first pick would be BJJ - it has all the bells and whistles kids like in martial arts, and the techniques they learn are immediately useful even to beginners:

My second choice would be wrestling, though this is usually a less pleasant experience for the child. If neither of those are available, Judo or Sambo is a viable 3rd option. I would avoid pseudo-grappling styles that don't include any actual sparring.

In childhood and early adolescence, cardio training in general is especially important, as it is the main exercise factor that contributes to healthy body growth at this age. BJJ is a very cardio intensive work out, and most BJJ coaches encourage their students to do cardio training (if not make them do additional cardio training in class.)

Once a youth is old enough to have a driver's license, and have friends who drive cars, they can potentially get into a wider variety of self defense situations. While grappling is the best way to handle an opponent one-on-one, striking training (like boxing or Muay Thai) includes skills not focused on heavily in grappling that are very handy if a strangers attack: managing distance, using footwork to avoid attacks, landing blows to the jaw or legs that can significantly slow down or stop an attacker. My first pick here would be Muay Thai:

Other types of traditional kick boxing with low kicks like Sanda, Savate or Knock-Down Karate (like Enshin or Kyokushin) would be my second choice, though they lack the extended clinch fighting of Muay Thai. Boxing would be third viable option if the other choices were not available. I would avoid any self defense style that didn't include any actual sparring, or which did stop-and-go "point fighting."

In late adolescence and young adulthood in addition to cardio, strength training is very important to promote good body growth. This builds a healthier foundation for the rest of their life. A good traditional kickboxing style with low kicks is itself a challenging strength training exercise, and all instructors have their students do strength training as part of their striking training, and many instructors also encourage their students to do additional strength training outside of class.

Adults interested in martial arts should peruse a well rounded martial arts education if they don't already have one. MMA would be my first choice here, because it will help you clear up any misconceptions you might have about your own ability to defend yourself:

If MMA isn't available, than any of the above mentioned martial arts would make a decent 2nd choice. Adults need to build flexibility in addition to cardio and strength training, in order to promote longevity and reduce injury. By this I am not talking about "warm up stretches" I mean going for serious gains in flexibility. Training to do both striking and grappling together as in MMA is a good flexibility exercise in and of itself, and most instructors have stretching exercises as part of their curriculum, as well as encourage students to pursue flexibility exercises outside of class.

There are many interesting esoteric martial arts out there like weapon martial arts, self-defense styles and Tai Chi. But in order to utilize those advanced techniques you need a foundation of solid basics that includes plenty of sparring first!

BE the Shoulin!

Soooo much lineage in martial arts. In most cases it is an imitation of Chinese Martial Arts lineage ("my teacher's teacher's teacher trained under Bruce Lee") or tracing the arts roots back to its Chinese Martial Arts lineage ("Karate originally meant Chinese hand and is probably based on Crane Kung Fu.") And in Chinese Martial Arts, 90% of the time the goal is to do one thing and one thing only: to demonstrate how that style of Martial Arts was derived at the Shoulin Temple.

(This can lead to extremely severe errors in deciding how to train. For example many people decide to train in Wing Chun to try to be like Bruce Lee, tracing Lee's lineage back to Wing Chun master Yip Man. The problem is Bruce Lee hated Wing Chun, the vast majority of his criticisms of Traditional Martial Arts (TMA) were based on his own experiences in Wing Chun. He had much nicer things to say about other TMA like Choy Li Fut. If you want to be like Bruce Lee, the one thing you would never want to do is Wing Chun.)

BUT what was so great about the Shoulin Temple? It was that so many different people went there from around China to seek asylum, and so many of those were mercenaries and soldiers, and because they had time on their hands to refine their arts, evolve their arts, and to spar it out. In other words who did the Shoulin trace their lineages to? They traced their lineage to themselves for being an awesome fight club.

It really is not your lineage that matters. It is the community of people you train with. All around the world right now the martial arts masters of tomorrow are being created in MMA clubs and other serious martial communities full of people willing to spar and improve their hands on ability. Your sparring partners and you coaching each other, that is being your generation's version of The Shoulin Temple.

But didn't the Shoulin have extraordinary powers? Lots of fight club type schools experiment with Yoga and TMA type training. Many of them cross train in weapon martial arts, and some of them even spar with weapons. Compared to TMA schools that don't do this, they have extraordinary powers.

The Summit BJJ club was originally founded as a sort of co-op, and still has the most affordable BJJ training in the area. When they started, the most advanced student they had was a purple belt. When I started the most advanced student was a single brown belt and a few purple belts. I was there when the first student was awarded his black belt and a few of the other members of the club got their brown belts. Now the club has multiple black belts. WHY did their skill improve so much? Because they got together and trained four times a week for several years, and because they had the type of community they needed to pull that off.

At Tres Espadas our contempt for lineage is a core part of our club's ethos. Tres Espadas was founded by rogue students who broke away from Doc Fai Wong's kung fu system because we decided that we didn't share the same vision. They wanted fitness, they wanted to make people better. The first thing they taught was a solid front kick. We wanted to "feed Christians to lions" in the ancient Roman gladiatorial arenas. The first thing our club members would know is how to knife fight. Over the years we have accumulated a lot more hands on actionable Weapon Martial Arts knowledge through sparring than we would have ever learned studying the endless number of weapon forms in Doc Fai Wong's system.

Don't wait for a master to come along and grant you martial arts abilities. Find or found a like minded community willing to train and spar in order to pursue the abilities you seek! 

What is Chi?

Here I will generally describe what people think "chi" (aka "ki" aka "qi") is, then what I think it is, and then my experience with its limitations as far as martial arts is concerned. In general there are three main explanations of chi: Religious, Alternative Medicine, and Practical.

1.Religious is "chi as life force":

• When someone says "chi is the life force in every living thing" that means almost the same thing as the "soul" of any living thing, and is one baby step away from talking about the afterlife or animism.
• The Founder of Aikido had a view of Chi that was very similar to the "holy spirit" in some forms of Christianity, "I felt the universe suddenly quake, and that a golden spirit sprang up from the ground, veiled my body... my body became light. I was... clearly aware of the mind of God, the creator of the universe. At that moment I was enlightened: the source of [the martial way] is God's love ..." I have had similar experiences through participation in religion (as lots of other people have,) but I can't say they made me a better fighter. 
• "No touch" martial arts techniques called "Chi" could be the result of intentional or unintentional psychophysical contitioning from poor martial arts instruction. See my post on Psychic Martial Arts.
• When you encounter someone with cult like devotion to chi, you are talking to someone who views chi from a religious perspective.

2. Alternative medicine is where chi theory overlaps with kundalini theory in yoga: 

• Supposedly there is some kind of energy in the body which you can train to enhance your physical performance. 
• Some describe this as a some type of bioelectic power running through your nervous system, like an electric eel. 
• In the very worst cases people think they can use chi to resist martial arts attacks or light stuff on fire with their bare hands. 
• I first saw this documented in the series "Ring of Fire: An Indonesian Oddesy" (1988), in Part 3: "East of Krakatoa".

3. Practical is seeing chi as something all people have and most athletes develop without necessarily using he word "chi" for it: 

• Tai Chi intentionally focuses on good posture and physical balance. Doing Tai Chi standing mediation makes you focus on how your spine is aligned with gravity and can be painful if you do not. Forms force you to practice good blance in a similar way, and even have moves that require you to practice balancing on one leg. Stationary push hands is litterally a balance drill with resistance. Moving step push hands is focused sparring concentrating on maintaining and disrupting balance. IT IS NO SUPRISE THEN THAT THE PEER REVIEWED LITERATURE RECOMMENDS TAI CHI TRAINING FOR INJURY PREVENTION (specifically because of posture control and falling prevention) IN OLDER ADLUTS: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1724328/pdf/v035p00148.pdf If we consider how much perfect posture can improve the maximum weight of a squat or deadlift, a combination of good posture and balance could explain the phenomenon the internal martial arts call "chi."
• When I discussed chi with BJJ  black belt (a purple belt at the time) and Wu Tai Chi lineage master Dmitri Gak, he thought that it chi was simply developing all the small connective muscles between the major muscle groups, especially stabilizer muscles. 
• The literal translation of "chi" is "air" or "breath" so that any time in athletics when we consciously focus on our breathing, that could be seen as "chi." When I hear BJJ black belts talk about developing a superior sense of balance by way of focusing on their breathing, I am hearing a practical view of "chi." 
• Some traditional martial arts see chi as "mental focus," or visualizing in your mind what you want your body to do, and/or bringing your mind and body together as one in the moment to be able to react without hesitation. The same concepts exist in western sports psychology.
• Some see chi as that secret sauce, the combination of body structure, adrenaline, and emergency stores of chemicals pumping into muscles and the nervous system that allow people to do extraordinary things in emergencies.
• Others see chi as type of sensitivity that can be trained by being aware of how your body feels, and by trying to "feel" the intentions of the opponent when you are in contact with them.

None of these practical views on chi excuse the participant from training to learn martial arts technique and sparring, but they do suggest that sparring itself could be a chi-enhancing exercise. These practical views of chi are compatible with each other. I have done Tai Chi standing meditation, the ultimate chi-building exercise, for 30 minutes every day since 2004. I find I am much less likely to get injured the rest of the day after doing it than before doing it. I have also noticed people doing this kind of training continuing to train in full contact martial arts later in life than their peers - and I myself am an example of that, as I did my first full contact martial arts in the late 80's (though I have not trained continuously that entire time.)

In the case of stationary push hands (a blance resistance drill) competition, people who do standing meditation are generally a lot better at stationary push hands than people who don't do standing mediation. I saw this play out at a Tiger Balm Internationals in the early 2000's, and after the push hands competition it was clear that the people who were better at it had about as much experience doing those drills as everyone else, but they also did their standing mediation daily. This is what stationary push hands drill competition looks like:

However, stationary push hands drills-with-resistance should not be confused with push-hands sparring, which is basically no-gi Chinese wrestling, not entirely unlike Sumo, where the objectives are to throw your opponent on the ground or out of the ring:

In 2006 I managed to get myself invited to an in-house push hands tournament for the Wudang Dan Pai, an older form of Tai Chi that is historically parallel to Chen style. WDP teachers train students to fight in Chinese Kickboxing and push hands sparring. I had done the kick boxing side of Tai Chi before, but I hadn't seen the no-gi Chinese wrestling push hands before. The first guy I went up against had a very similar back ground to me, had done some Tai Chi and some kickboxing. I used a lot of "parting the horses mane" type of trips, and beat him by a comfortable margin, 10 to 7. But the second trash talking wrestler had a significant weight advantage on me, had a wider range of grappling experience than me at the time, and had more experience in this type of push hands. I was brutally slammed on the ground several times, and by the end was just keeping my balance to prevent that from happening, which made it easier for him to push me out of the ring... second worst beating of my life, 0 to 10. He was finally beat in the final bout by someone who weighed slightly less than him but had a lot more reach.

In full contact weapon fighting I have found that relaxing before the sparring makes the whole experience a lot less exhausting and more enjoyable. HOWEVER one time I took this too far, and did standing mediation, yang forms, and deep stretching right before taking on a very-worthy opponent. THIS "CHI TRAINING" IS HOW THE NAGINATA KNOCK OUT HAPPENED:

It can feel nice to get your chi flowing. Your mind relaxes so that you can appreciate life, smell the roses and listen to the birds chirp. HOWEVER I am telling you THAT is the LAST thing you want to do in combat. You WANT your adrenaline going, you NEED your mind to suddenly become hyper vigilant... it's NOT SUPPOSED TO BE COMFORTABLE, IT'S A FIGHT!

However Chi training helped me learn to fight as it improved my mental focus and sense of balance. I have used PRACTICAL Chi training to help myself and others to be better at fighting. Though I am generally skeptical of the above religous and alternative medicine views of what chi is, I generally agree with the practical theories of what chi is.

Tai Chi Movement

In Tai Chi, there are 13 main types of movement called the Eight Gates and Five Steps. This is a type of categorization that is used to analyze moves in a fight. Here I will explain what they are and how they apply to combat sports. Tai Chi is more focused on clinching than other ranges of fighting, so these movement styles are usually presented from that perspective.

The Eight Gates are elements of martial arts techniques:

1. "Ward Off" is posture, especially keeping the opponent at the right distance from your body for what you want to do. It is also "having a good fighting stance." Keeping your hands up is good "Ward Off" in boxing. One example from grappling is "framing" when you are on the bottom and you are trying to avoid someone getting decent side control on you.
2. "Press" is staying on the opponent - the same concept as "being sticky" - keeping in contact with the opponent so they can't get out of range. In MMA this could be grabbing someone in a Thai clinch to avoid their kicks. In boxing it could be continuously jabbing to judge distance and keep pressure on the opponent.
3. "Yield" is getting out of the way. When someone pushes at you too hard, you can unbalance them by moving or turning in such a way that they miss most or all of your body. In boxing this could be bobbing and weaving. In grappling if someone is completely overpowering you in the clinch, and you realize you will soon be thrown, and you manage instead to pull guard for a more neutral potion on the ground, this would be another example of yielding movement. In the clinch, if you briefly turn away from your opponent in order to get a Russian tie arm bar, this is actually be categorized as a "roll back", an arm bar as a result of a yield.
4. "Push" is an attack that accelerates AFTER contact is made with the opponent. In boxing simply shoving the other boxer would be a push. In grappling, going from guard to a "hip bump" to get into full mount is an example of a pushing attack.
5. "Pluck" is to unbalance an opponent by pulling on them. In Muay Thai if you pull someone with an over hook or under hook in order to sweep them, this is an example of plucking. In grappling most ankle picks are examples of plucks.
6. "Strike" (or "Elbow") is opposite of Push, it is an attack that fully accelerates before it makes contact with the opponent. Most punches, kicks, knees, elbows etc. are strikes. In grappling striking movement is usually forbidden, but in MMA raining down elbows in mount would be an excellent example of strike.
7. "Bump" (or "Shoulder") is an attack that begins to accelerate before it makes contact with the target, but tries to keep going at the same speed after it makes contact with the target. In Tai Chi this is a shoulder check, not entirely unlike what you see in some team sports like American Football. In kick boxing a "push kick" intended to knock the opponent back is a good example of a bump. Using a Judo-type foot sweep in grappling, which is moving quickly before it makes contact with the targets leg, and is supposed to keep on moving after it makes contact, is another example of bump movement.
8. "Split" is moving the opponent's body into two different directions, like blocking the back of their leg with your knee, and then pushing them over your knee... or standing arm bars. In Muay Thai a clinch sweep that aims to make the target's upper body go in a different direction than their lower body could be considered splitting. Virtually all arm bars in submission grappling would be considered splitting in Tai Chi. A "snap double" take down where your head goes forward into their abdomen while your hands pull on the back of their knees is another example of splitting.

The Five Steps are working for position:

1. "Rooting" is being able to resist moving when someone is trying to move you, for example when someone tries to shove you and then nothing happens and you hold your ground with your feet not moving significantly, this is rooting. Keeping your knees bent in boxing so that you don't get knocked around easily by the force of oncoming punches is good rooting. In grappling, if you have a low mount, and you put your feet in the prayer position to make it difficult for the opponent to throw you off of them, this is an example of rooting.
2. "Forward step" is moving towards your opponent just like in boxing. In grappling this could be transitioning from a low mount to a high mount.
3. "Backwards step" is moving away from your opponent, as footwork would normally allow in stand up fighting. On the ground, a back door escape from mount would be an example of backwards step.
4. "Left step" is moving to your left around the opponent, as footwork normally allows in stand up fighting. On the ground, going from side control with your right side closer to your opponent's head to full mount would be an example of step left step.
5. "Right step" is moving to your right around the opponent, as footwork normally allows in stand up fighting. On the ground, going from side control with your left side closer to your opponent's head to full mount would be an example of step right step.

Tai Chi is usually cross trained (with other Kung Fu styles,) and I think part of why is because Tai Chi by way of this above theory begs the analysis of other styles. And as you have guessed by now I think the best way for Tai Chi people to learn more about this kind of movement is to cross train in kick boxing or MMA.

Sparring First

Sparring is the most important aspect of any martial art. Every martial arts training session should include a significant amount of sparring. When this does not happen, it's time to start cutting out some of that other stuff that is cutting into sparring time. What should be cut out to make sparring time: calisthenics, drills, warm ups, weight lifting, cardio, forms, kata? That depends on what works for your style, you have to prioritize, and sparring must have top priority.

But this is really about katas and forms isn't it, don't you have Bruce Lee style chip on your shoulder about forms? Not at all, unless kata/forms attempt to substitute for sparring. If I had to draw the line somewhere, I would say that students should be sparring before they finish learning their first kata or form, because they can't truly understand the moves in the form without sparring. If you are getting into a second kata or form and still no sparring, then you are dangerously close to practicing performance arts instead of martial arts.

And I am a critic of Bruce Lee, as a former Choy Lay Fut practitioner I have no end of bad things to say about that disgruntled Wing Chun student... but the value of Bruce Lee's ideas can only be manifested in the same way other martial arts ideas can be manifested, and that is through sparring:

But the really big problem I have had with Bruce Lee is his advocating of leading in with his strong side, and doing lots of back fists like in kumite point fighting... I feel like he was influenced by that element in his day, and more importantly his "Art of Jeet Kune Do" was used to justify that nonsense almost destroying the martial arts scene in the USA.

BUT Bruce Lee didn't advocate kumite point fighting, he advocated serious sparring, MMA to be specific. To be real sparring (and not fencing) sparring must be:

1. Free sparring - not stop and go, not talking about good hits, no judges calling points, no interruptions except for safety reasons, no preset attacks, no preset defenses.
2. Contact - you must be doing real attacks, and those attacks must make contact. I am not saying it should be 100% force or 100% speed, but it does have to be real.
3. Safe - the purpose of sparring is to train, so that if you accidentally injure your opponent so they can't spar anymore, you have impaired your own training. In sparring you need to keep your opponent safe, opposite of a fight.

Real sparring is then "safe contact sparring." But your martial arts moves are too deadly to spar with? One of the best martial arts when it comes to dedicated sparring time in every class is BJJ, and there are NO more dangerous moves than limb destruction and deadly chokes, which is exactly the attacks they focus on training in. 

But what about eye gouging? The basic Shoulin straight attack to the face is a palm strike combined with an eye rake, called a Tiger Claw. The style that incorporates this perhaps the most is Hun Gar, and they are known for their brawling and sparring. Here they are doing focused sparring with Tiger Claws:

Even the deadly Ninja can spar:

Deadly weapons? Spar:

Traditional weapon martial arts without any sparring tradition like Archery? Spar:

But what if you are doing McDojo karate fighting or no sparring at all, isn't it best for the ideologically impaired to simply never spar at all? If these two can spar, so can you:

As rare as serious Tai Chi may be, even serious Tai Chi people spar:

I once attended a BJJ club were some of the senior members went rock climbing together, and considered it relevant BJJ conditioning. They even named their club after the practice, but they didn't make people climb a rock climbing wall in BJJ class. You would have had to attend the club for a while before getting invited to go rock climbing with them. Sparring for all students came a long time before this club's signature conditioning technique. Consider that before asking students to learn two katas before doing any contact free sparring - is your club there to teach conditioning, or is it there to teach martial arts?

MMA in Martial Arts

Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) is "God's gift" to Traditional Martial Arts (TMA.) At least in the USA it has saved the martial arts community from kumite point fighting, and it has has given a training opportunity for all martial artists to make sure they have all their bases covered for real fighting. Some have accused me of trying to save all of martial arts through full contact free sparring...

I started doing martial arts in the late 80's, purely for self defense reasons. I joined a school that was part American full contact karate and part Filipino Martial Arts (the master of that style had some sort of WEKAF background.) Our first few months of practice was getting used to full contact beat-em-up sparring, where we really got our hands dirty learning to throw down.

Then the tournament was announced. A point fighting kumite tournament. We needed to do things a little different, and do a different kind of sparring. I didn't realize it at the time, but our stances became very long, our sparring became no contact, and worst of all we learned to freeze up whenever we thought we scored a point or someone else was scoring a point on us. It was the opposite of self defense training.

Then we actually fought in the 1989 Lakeside Invitational tournament in WA. I remember the master's last words of advice to me: "it isn't very effective for self defense, but if you throw a back fist instead of a straight punch it will be easier for the judges to see." I got 2nd place in my division.

Within an hour that same master packed up his bags and walked out of the tournament, never to return to a kumite tournament again, almost immediately seeking out the kickboxing community and training his students in leg kicks. (The reason he walked out was he was kicking his opponents in the head so quickly the judges weren't calling his kicks as points... until he finally kicked his opponent in the head so hard that he fell down... and then the judges still didn't see it, even though his opponent was complaining about contact.) This was just as kick boxing was starting to pick up in the USA:

What happened in the 80's was that most martial arts schools became kumite point fighting schools. If you were doing Kung Fu, you were just doing Chinese-flavored kumite point fighting, Tae Kwon Do was reduced to Korean flavored kumite point fighting. At that Lakeside Invitational tournament, there was even a "Judo Boxing" club there doing point fighting, pulling other fighters to the ground and then scoring with a light jab towards their opponent's head... even grappling was turning into grappling flavored kumite point fighting.  One guy I know tried to go into a point fighting tournament with his style listed as "Muay Thai."

Movements like the UFC no holds barred and K-1 striking professional tournament pulled Martial Arts in the USA out of its death spiral, and got a real conversation about effective self defense started again. Suddenly few could ignore the importance of ground fighting, and even less could ignore the importance of clinch grappling. And everyone could see one thing brighter above all others: no matter what your martial art was, your most important training activity you did was full contact free sparring. Where before everything was just a different flavor of kumite point fighting, now everything was becoming another flavor of MMA, a very significant improvement, and for most martial arts a badly needed return to ancient tradition!

Don't get me wrong, MMA has its blind spots just like all other martial arts.  But what I want to point out here is how it can help you with your study of martial arts today. MMA covers all the athletic bases of fighting: conditioning, clinching, ground fighting for submission, stand up striking and plenty of sparring. No matter what your martial art is, MMA can help you make sure you have all your bases covered.

In summary, two points here:

1. MMA saved martial arts in the USA from turning most martial arts schools from being different flavors of kumite point fighting to being different flavors of MMA, returning to the ancient ways of full contact free sparring.
2. MMA can save YOUR martial arts skills by making sure you have all the basic conditioning, ground fighting, clinch grappling, stand up striking and sparring you need to realistically prepare for an unarmed combat situation. 

I do mediocre full contact weapon sparring and Tai Chi. Do I also go work out at the MMA gym and try to get beat up a few times a week? Absolutely. Why? Because training the way I do, I want to make sure my critical blind spots are covered:

Internal Skill

There is a fantasy martial art skill where a short Asian man is able to toss around larger opponents like a rag doll. This is shown in martial arts demos (like most Aikido randori,) but usually does not show up in sparring. The consensus on Bullshido.net is that the following video is not fake:

IF that larger guy really is a wrestler, he's definitely out of practice, because wrestlers train really hard and have great conditioning, and would not be out of breath that quickly. But the fantasy isn't throwing around other skilled grapplers, the fantasy is throwing around larger opponents, and that is clearly happening there.

THAT is the skill people doing internal martial arts such as Aikido, Pa Kua and Tai Chi are trying to develop, and it is no coincidence that the master in the video above practices Tai Chi. But he got that skill by training to fight in these kind of tournaments:

But are these two videos really connected, are they really the same thing? Here's what happens in one of those tournaments when the opponents are not evenly matched in terms of size, conditioning and skill:

There's that Aikido skill again, tossing people like rag dolls, this time in an open tournament.

But the above video before that, the 2nd video with the evenly matched opponents reminded you of something, didn't it... Sumo: the ring size and format, objectives and techniques are similar. Though I didn't quite grasp the significance of this at the time, in the early 90's I had a short, stocky friend from Japan who had used his sport Sumo training effectively in self defense, at least once against multiple opponents:

The fact is the Mongolians spread this kind of grappling all over Asia and Eastern Europe if they didn't have it before. This kind of grappling's application on battle field is obvious: it is better for you to be on your feet and worse for your enemy to be prone. Time and again this type of stand-up grappling to throw the opponent on the ground is found in culture after culture, all over the world.

THAT is the skill that made Aikido famous. So how come most Aikidoka can't do it? Because they don't do that type of grappling. How come the early Aikido masters could do it? First, the Aikido founder probably did Chinese internal martial arts and probably had significant tai chi type sparring skills, BUT even if he did not, his involvement in Sumo is well documented. Other early Aikido masters also had Sumo backgrounds! Aikido is supposed to be like Tai Chi in that it is supposed to grant Sumo power to people not large enough to be Sumo wrestlers. But that skill can only be achieved by training in that skill directly, as shown in the above videos: Kata and forms may or may not be appropriate conditioning for that kind of sparring, but they are no substitute for that kind of sparring!

As a martial arts critic, I would ask "why don't we see this in MMA?" First of all we have, just for example in UFC 1 a kickboxer* used exactly that sort of technique to take out a Sumo practitioner:

Second of all, MMA by way of BJJ and Sambo is highly influenced by Judo. Kano added a rare school of techniques to his Judo when he created the sport of Judo, which were the ground fighting techniques that are now ubiquitous in MMA. With added techniques for ground fighting, it made the most sense to try to fall on your opponents when you throw them, keep them pinned, and from there try to submit them. They teach the most deadly and effective unarmed self defense skills known to mankind: chokes, limb destruction and slamming heads on the ground. Yet ALL training has blind spots. Throwing the opponent on the ground with you still standing is a blind spot for this kind of training.

*But notice that this is the objective for most combat sports: in boxing and kickboxing, knocking the guy off of his feet is plan A. This is the only way to score in Knock Down Karate. Though it has very limited amounts of clinch time allowed, Chinese kickboxing actually allows numerous throws to this same end. Numerous indigenous grappling arts have the same objective. But as I have mentioned before, the combat sport where I see the most internal martial arts skill is in Thai Kickboxing:

No wonder Muay Thai has a great reputation for handling larger opponents or multiple opponents, with their footwork, practical striking, and throw-the-opponent-down style of grappling. Here's an example of Muay Thai technique being used to train people to take on multiple opponents:

So in many ways, Muay Thai IS the REAL Aikido. But how could Aikido, Tai Chi and Muay Thai be almost exactly the same thing? Listen carefully to how this kickboxing & MMA coach explains his encounter with a Tai Chi master starting at 8 minutes, 45 seconds: